Program: HLM 6 Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling Authors: Stephen Raudenbush, Tony Bryk, & Richard Congdon Publisher: Scientific Software International, Inc. (c) 2000 techsupport@ssicentral.com www.ssicentral.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Module: HLM2.EXE (6.06.2857.2) Date: 13 September 2016, Tuesday Time: 17:57:46 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS HLM2 RUN Problem Title: no title The data source for this run = C:\Users\sandrine.pihet\Documents\Articles&Chapitres&Rapports\Art_BurdenDailyLife_SP-CMP\BurdenDailyLife_AndoHLM\P1&P2_Pré_N26_Complet.mdm The command file for this run = whlmtemp.hlm Output file name = C:\Users\sandrine.pihet\Documents\Articles&Chapitres&Rapports\Art_BurdenDailyLife_SP-CMP\BurdenDailyLife_AndoHLM\hlm2.txt The maximum number of level-1 units = 322 The maximum number of level-2 units = 26 The maximum number of iterations = 10000 Method of estimation: full maximum likelihood Weighting Specification ----------------------- Weight Variable Weighting? Name Normalized? Level 1 no Level 2 no Precision no The outcome variable is FARDEAU The model specified for the fixed effects was: ---------------------------------------------------- Level-1 Level-2 Coefficients Predictors ---------------------- --------------- INTRCPT1, P0 INTRCPT2, B00 * RELATION slope, P1 INTRCPT2, B10 * PSY slope, P2 INTRCPT2, B20 * PBSGENDE slope, P3 INTRCPT2, B30 '*' - This level-1 predictor has been centered around its group mean. The model specified for the covariance components was: --------------------------------------------------------- Sigma squared (constant across level-2 units) Tau dimensions INTRCPT1 RELATION slope PSY slope PBSGENDE slope Summary of the model specified (in equation format) --------------------------------------------------- Level-1 Model Y = P0 + P1*(RELATION) + P2*(PSY) + P3*(PBSGENDE) + E Level-2 Model P0 = B00 + R0 P1 = B10 + R1 P2 = B20 + R2 P3 = B30 + R3 Run-time deletion has reduced the number of level-1 records to 280 Run-time deletion has reduced the number of level-2 groups to 25 Iterations stopped due to small change in likelihood function ******* ITERATION 1050 ******* Sigma_squared = 235.66343 Standard Error of Sigma_squared = 22.88242 Tau INTRCPT1,P0 283.76142 -1.26215 1.14599 0.06644 RELATION,P1 -1.26215 0.12868 0.00254 0.12188 PSY,P2 1.14599 0.00254 0.00747 0.00497 PBSGENDE,P3 0.06644 0.12188 0.00497 0.12524 Standard Errors of Tau INTRCPT1,P0 87.71975 1.86503 1.01921 1.75604 RELATION,P1 1.86503 0.07296 0.02815 0.06024 PSY,P2 1.01921 0.02815 0.01854 0.02515 PBSGENDE,P3 1.75604 0.06024 0.02515 0.06524 Tau (as correlations) INTRCPT1,P0 1.000 -0.209 0.787 0.011 RELATION,P1 -0.209 1.000 0.082 0.960 PSY,P2 0.787 0.082 1.000 0.163 PBSGENDE,P3 0.011 0.960 0.163 1.000 ---------------------------------------------------- Random level-1 coefficient Reliability estimate ---------------------------------------------------- INTRCPT1, P0 0.927 RELATION, P1 0.356 PSY, P2 0.070 PBSGENDE, P3 0.412 ---------------------------------------------------- Note: The reliability estimates reported above are based on only 24 of 25 units that had sufficient data for computation. Fixed effects and variance components are based on all the data. The value of the likelihood function at iteration 1050 = -1.206763E+003 The outcome variable is FARDEAU Final estimation of fixed effects: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Standard Approx. Fixed Effect Coefficient Error T-ratio d.f. P-value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- For INTRCPT1, P0 INTRCPT2, B00 36.242432 3.527981 10.273 24 0.000 For RELATION slope, P1 INTRCPT2, B10 -0.318421 0.105681 -3.013 24 0.006 For PSY slope, P2 INTRCPT2, B20 0.234465 0.056791 4.129 24 0.000 For PBSGENDE slope, P3 INTRCPT2, B30 0.370362 0.100486 3.686 24 0.001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The outcome variable is FARDEAU Final estimation of fixed effects (with robust standard errors) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Standard Approx. Fixed Effect Coefficient Error T-ratio d.f. P-value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- For INTRCPT1, P0 INTRCPT2, B00 36.242432 3.527347 10.275 24 0.000 For RELATION slope, P1 INTRCPT2, B10 -0.318421 0.104403 -3.050 24 0.006 For PSY slope, P2 INTRCPT2, B20 0.234465 0.055864 4.197 24 0.000 For PBSGENDE slope, P3 INTRCPT2, B30 0.370362 0.099996 3.704 24 0.001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final estimation of variance components: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Random Effect Standard Variance df Chi-square P-value Deviation Component ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTRCPT1, R0 16.84522 283.76142 23 375.28012 0.000 RELATION slope, R1 0.35872 0.12868 23 51.32211 0.001 PSY slope, R2 0.08642 0.00747 23 22.83639 >.500 PBSGENDE slope, R3 0.35390 0.12524 23 35.72707 0.044 level-1, E 15.35133 235.66343 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: The chi-square statistics reported above are based on only 24 of 25 units that had sufficient data for computation. Fixed effects and variance components are based on all the data. Statistics for current covariance components model -------------------------------------------------- Deviance = 2413.525852 Number of estimated parameters = 15 Model comparison test ----------------------------------- Chi-square statistic = 225.09929 Number of degrees of freedom = 5 P-value = 0.000